Sunday, April 6, 2008

The Right Stuff...



Over the last few years the Mouse has had a good stretch at the box office. Between the Pirate movies, the Pixar films and several other smaller surprises the Disney brand, along with its Touchstone division to a lesser degree has enjoyed being at the top or near the top in terms of success and growth.

One wonders if this streak will continue or could the film division be just lucky? As in everything else, decisions are made at the top and head down hill. Success or failure comes from those that make the decisions affecting the whole of the company... that's why they make the big bucks of course. So in seeing how the near and far end future of the Mouse is concerned we'll have to take a look at the top. The main people running the Walt Disney Studios. That would start first and foremost with the Chairman of the company, Dick Cook.

Cook became the top exec at Walt Disney Studios in 2002, after Eisner named him to succeed Peter Schneider the former head of the studios. Here's an example(one of the few) of Eisner actually making a good decision, btw. Of note, Cook is the only high level executive to have worked for Disney since Eisner took over in 1984.

He's one of the most likable Suits in Hollywood today... this is a great asset in a town built on relationships. Johnny Depp, Nicholas Cage and many others regard Cook as a friendly bridge between management and talent. He's someone that can get an actor to look at something who normally wouldn't. And besides all this, he's something that you don't normally see in Hollywood. A truly nice guy.

Now right beneath him we have an enigma that is forming...

Oren Aviv, Walt Disney Motion Pictures Group President who succeeded Nina Jacobson in the "Big Cut" that happened in July of 2006. He's been moving to increase the Disney Brand of films, which is quite the opposite of what Eisner did back in the mid 80's(which Eisner was right to do back then, btw). The Touchstone Brand will still be active, but the focus will be on more family movies and to associate the Disney label with better quality movies. This might puzzle some, because many Disney Geeks will recall one of Aviv's famous(or infamous) statements about the kind of films he's looking to make:

"I want to make movies like The Pacifier"

I know, I know... just like you, that statement makes the hair on the back of my head raise up. That movie was nothing more than a glorified rip-off of "Kindergarden Cop" and an average one at that. But to be fair to Mr. Aviv, I think it may have been taken out of context. I have a feeling I know what he was trying to say, even though it probably didn't come across so well. The movies he's wanting to get into production are supposed to reach a certain audience and creating films that have a generational crossover appeal(especially internationally), are what he wants to market. Now many of the Disney faithful will find that this could include those dreaded "tween" movies that we don't care for. You know, the "Hannah Montana/Miley Cyrus: Best of Both Worlds Concert Tour", "High School Musical 3: Senior Year" and other things that have keep many a Disney fan from even venturing into clicking the remote to the Disney Channel for fear of running into "Raven" or "The Suite Life". While I agree that it ain't my cup of tea, I can understand why the Mouse wants to get this group of teens. Aviv understands this too. I tend to try and brush off this as the modern day equivalent of "The Absent Minded Professor", "That Darn Cat" or "The Computer Wore Tennis Shoes". While movies like the "Pirates of the Caribbean" series or the "Narnia" series are representative of something along the line of "20,000 Leagues Under The Sea" or "Treasure Island". I'm sure back in the 50's many an adult audience would have rather seen Marilyn Monroe in "Some Like It Hot" or another film that these films for their bobby-sox teenager. Things change and sometimes they don't...

Aviv understands the Disney style of movies it seems from some of the projects that have been greenlit over the past year or so. We have "Bedtime Stories", "Beverly Hills Chihuahua"(think "That Darn Cat"... hopefully), "The Chronicles of Narnia" Prince Caspian", and others set for the calendar year. Coming up next year are "When In Rome", "Fraggle Rock" and "Old Dogs", "A Christmas Carol" and a couple others. Not everything will fit my taste, but that's not his job. It's to fit the audience, both here in America and the world. And if he doesn't do that, well he won't be there long. We're about to find out as movies that are part of his philosophy begin taking up the majority of the Mouse's pipeline starting this summer. If his projects flop over the next year and a half then we'll know his taste is not the audiences and he'll be typing up one of those farewell letters that Suits tend to issue when they want to spend more time with their family.

Now across from the Walt Disney Studios lot in temporary headquarters of Walt Disney Animation Studios known as "The Hat Building" sits that figure that blurs the line between Suit and Creative. John Lasseter, the Chief Creative Officer of Walt Disney Animation Studios and Pixar Animation Studios... essentially the head of almost anything animated at the Mouse. Now, he's an interesting hybrid, because as well as heading both of these animated units you, he'll be involved in live-action for the Pixar unit over the next few years with the co-production with Warner of "1906" and then Pixar's own "Princess of Mars" films. Should the animation unit in Burbank be blessed by his box office abilities at the Lamp and then the live action works succeed they you'll see more and more of his power seep over to Walt Disney Pictures. Aviv will have a powerful shadow looming over his desk. But come this fall we'll finally get to see the freshman work of Lasseter's tenure at Disney when "Bolt" comes to theaters this November. The reign of the "Mousetro" really starts kicking up dust next year when "The Princess and the Frog" debuts though... many inside the walls of TeamDisney are said to be very excited about that film and "Rapunzel" the following year. There are a couple of projects that could get the greenlit to move into story later this year as one already has moved into this position to follow Glen Keane's co-directorial debut. Lasseter's the monkey in the wrench, fly in the ointment that has the unknown quantity.

We'll find soon as to how things are going. By the end of this year the new leadership at Disney will have weathered it's first test of fire. If they survive past next year is something no one in Hollywood can know... because the life expectancy of a Suit in Tinsel Town is usually very short. Half a decade is an eternity for most. Dick Cook has already survived that... Oren Aviv is a question about to be answered... and John Lasseter, well he doesn't have to worry about problems for a while since he has the backing of that guy in Cupertino. He's got at least four or five years before he has to worry and that is only if just about everything he touches turns to "FLOP!". That ain't likely to happen.

This is a Disney Fairy Tale we're talking about, after all...

Friday, April 4, 2008

More Surrogates...


Jonathan Mostow's new film for Touchstone Pictures "The Surrogates" has lined up more actors. The production was supposed to start shooting in February but will lens the film this month instead.

They've added Ving Rhames, Radha Mitchell and Rosamund Pike to the cast of the Bruce Willis sci-fi thriller.

Thursday, April 3, 2008

Mouse Buys Disney Guide...


Walt Disney Pictures has purchased the spec script "Self-Guided" in the mid-six figures by Jared Stern with David Hoberman and Todd Lieberman attached to produce through their Mandeville Films.

The tale focuses on a man who finds himself back in high school as a guidance counselor so he can give advice to his younger self.

In Memorium: Frank Wells...


On this day...

Fourteen years ago today...

The beginning of the end of Michael Eisner's reign as savior of the Mouse started...

While on a skiing trip in Nevada's 's Ruby Mountains, Disney's President and Chief Operating Officer Frank Wells is killed when his helicopter experiences mechanical problems and crashes into a slope at 7,500 feet. With Wells gone, Eisner has lost his balance and greatly over compensates...

Jeffrey Katzenberg now wants the top spot now that Wells is no longer there, Eisner doesn't give it to him and Katzenberg leaves the company shortly thereafter(a lawsuit later filed by Katzenberg will cost the Mouse millions). The first ten years under their leadership has been a stunning success, thus begins Eisner's downfall...

Of course, it would take twelve years and many disappointments before the axe finally came, but this is the event that set that all in motion.

Frank Wells will be missed. He was a very good leader, a fine Suit for the Mouse and well liked among his colleagues. He and his family were/are/will always be remembered in our hearts and prayers.

Wednesday, April 2, 2008

The Elephant Graveyard...


On March, 25th 2005, Bob Iger put to death a department within the Walt Disney Company that has long been despised by many Suits and Creatives alike inside the Mouse.

The Strategic Planning Group.

Known inside Disney as the place where good ideas go to die... an Elephant Graveyard, really. If you had an idea, plan or proposal that went there, it stayed there.

Here is a snippet from the original press release from the Mouse:


________________________________________________

March 25, 2005
THE WALT DISNEY COMPANY TO REORGANIZE STRATEGIC PLANNING DIVISION

BURBANK, Calif., March 25, 2005 – To address today's rapidly evolving global business landscape, Michael D. Eisner, chief executive officer of The Walt Disney Company, and Robert A. Iger, president and chief operating officer and CEO-elect, today announced a restructuring of the company's Corporate Strategic Planning Division. The division will be restructured to more closely align with the company's growth priorities, including creativity and innovation, new technologies and international expansion.

Many of Strategic Planning's activities will be incorporated into the company's four business segments -- Studio Entertainment, Parks and Resorts, Consumer Products and Media Networks, as well as Disney's international organization. A smaller corporate group will continue to develop the corporate five-year plan and focus on acquisition opportunities, emerging businesses new to the company's existing portfolio and new technologies.
________________________________________________



And it was never, ever seen again(hopefully). This division of the company was like the KGB of the Mouse. When a memo was sent to you informing you that it was "evaluating" something of yours it was equivalent to the Soviet Secret Police coming to your home, knocking on your door and taking your idea/proposal away for questioning.

Yet another byproduct of that tragic helicopter crash which killed Frank Wells. Michael Eisner had great skills but great weaknesses also. Frank Wells was there to balance Eisner and give the Mouse and it's CEO a bit of perspective. the SPG was another growing example of how Eisner's ego grew when unchecked by Wells.

Several people at the Mouse are a result of the SPG. Among them are Jay Rasulo, President of Parks and Resorts(we all know my opinion of him), David Stainton, former President of Walt Disney Feature Animation(gone and thankfully forgotten), and Tom Staggs, Chief Financial Officer at the Mouse(Whom I've met only once and don't yet know enough about to justify praise or condemnation).

This group reported directly to Eisner and tended to bolster his need for justification of a project. If the SPG wanted to come to a conclusion that a proposal or particular part of the company was inefficient or unprofitable then the division would do the research it needed to come to that conclusion. It created the reality to back up its facts and I use the word "facts" very liberally here, friends. If the SPG wanted to prove the world was flat, it would begin doing research to prove it... not try and actually find out if the world is flat. Amazing, ain't it?

The company and particularly the SPG, through Eisner became increasingly "risk adverse" to the point of even telling one person in a meeting where it was pitched a cutting edge proposal that: ""we don't want to be the first into any new business... we'd rather be second or third, after the concept is proven." Now would Walt have ever succeeded if he had followed this model? Essentially, Eisner was using this division as his reasoning for "coasting" on the huge success and fortunes created by the company in the past. There was, perhaps, some creativity within the company but far less than a decade earlier and even more so than what had been there when Walt and Roy ran the company.

Want a shining example of what results from the Strategic Planning Group? It's something most of you all know...

Disney's California Adventure

In a letter that Roy E. Disney wrote when he was on his "Save Disney" campaign there was this little jewel:

"Strat Planning, in effect, "designed" Disney's California Adventure, by (1) setting a profit goal, (2) calculating how many people would attend, at what admission price, level of food consumption, and merchandise purchased, and then (3) capping the expenditure for the "show" at a figure which was almost guaranteed to produce a sub-standard park experience. The "real world" falls entirely outside of all these calculations, questions like "will I like this place?" or "Would I go there repeatedly?' simply are immaterial."

And we all know what happened. Roy knew what he was talking about. Having attended the openings of both DCA and Tokyo DisneySEA later in the same year, he could see which park was catering to its guest and which one was catering to the bottom line.

Thankfully the company is freed from such restraints now... is it perfect, though? No. There is still way too much bureaucracy. Much of it created by our good friend Jay Rasulo. All corporations tend to have layers of red tape and the Mouse still has more than its share, but it has been unburdened by a large creative impediment. Hopefully, the likes of Lasseter and others will overwhelm and simply outlast the remaining road blocks within the Mouse.

It's ironic that for the company to succeed the SPG must die... but even more ironic that the death of creativity at the Mouse was known as the Elephant Graveyard...

We all know an Elephant is supposed to be afraid of a Mouse, not the other way around.

Excelsior!


Stan Lee and the Mouse have three projects that have been developed from the colaboration between Disney and Lee's POW! Entertainment.

Richard LaGravenese (THE FISHER KING) will write and direct "Nick Ratchet," revolving around the adventures of a private eye.

Gary Goldman (NEXT) is writing the original script "Blaze", about which little is known.

Zoe Green("Wolverine & the X-Men" cartoon series) is working on a draft of "Tigress", is about a woman who starts to aquire animal feline instincts.

Stan and the Mouse want the properties to be potential franchises...

Time will tell.

Tuesday, April 1, 2008

Eisner Mounts Hostile Takeover Of Walt Disney Company!


Today it was announced in the New York Times business section that Michael Eisner has informed the Walt Disney Company Board of Directors that his investment group "The Tornante Company" intends to make an offer for controlling interest of the Walt Disney Company. Variety and the Hollywood Reporter are apparently preparing articles for tomorrow's edition since the news was revealed too late for publication in today's copy. Bob Iger is quoted as saying he was "stunned to hear Michael make such an announcement" and "the Walt Disney Company would be able to retain control of operations believing that shareholders would reject such an offer." Hollywood insiders are surprised that Eisner would make a play for the Mouse. "It appears he holds a grudge with the Board for having been forced out." said one Hollywood source. "Clearly, Michael felt embarrassed when the Board removed him as CEO and Michael never forgets who crosses him." Several sources are offering up varied opinions when it comes to the ability of Eisner's company coming up with the large amount of cash needed to wrest control of the daily operations of Disney. However several sources are stating that Eisner and Tornante have been secretly working over the past two years lining up a series of mysterious billionaire clients and at least one European conglomerate with his eyes set on returning to power and forcing the resignations of those on the Board. "Putting Steve Jobs on the Board was a big mistake for Iger to do" said a close Tornante Executive, "Michael hates that guy, if they wanted to start a war with him they've done it and this is Michael's first shot back." When asked for comments, several key employees at Tornante were suspiciously quite, referring question to their publicist, whom had yet to return calls to the Times. Blue Sky Disney has been in touch with several Disney sources and is awaiting confirmation from several of our contacts before addressing these shocking events. Wait, this just in...


A

P

R

I

L


F

O

O

L'

S


D

A

Y

!


TTFN