Tuesday, March 3, 2009

Monsters Live! Sort Of...


The Tokyo Disney Resort "Monsters Inc Ride and Go Seek" attraction website has finally gone live...

Now if I could only read Japanese I'd know what in the world it was saying. It's fun to look at though. Don't forget to move your cursor around when you click open those doors.

Cool effect...

Monday, March 2, 2009

Staff Of Kings Cover Comes Out...


Well, the cover for Lucasarts' "Indiana Jones and the Staff of Kings" has been released...

Now I only have one question. Wii? Wii!? WII!!? What the heck were you thinking Lucas!? Where's my PS3 version?

Sigh...

Back When We Were Young And Unborn...


They opened up a fifty year old time capsule the other day, and this was in it as well as this...

Walt Disney Productions, circa 1959. Walt was still there ruling over his growing kingdom. Disneyland was a mere four years old. They were about to release "Cinderella," production of "101 Dalmatians" was in full gear, production really hadn't begun yet on "The Jungle Book".

Life was simpler and I wasn't even born for years to come...

Hat Tip to Cartoon Brew.

PerfecTR2N...


Wow. You're away from Blue Sky Headquarters for a few hours and BAAM!, something like this pops up...

The guys over at Ain't It Cool News have got a scoop from someone close to the "Tron 2" production that has given them a good deal of plot details.

Very geeky, very cool. When I read it I was very excited to see the direction they're going. It sounds like this one has a great concept and if Lasseter is involved like I hear, it'll have a great script too. Click the link to see all plot/story points unless you don't like spoilers, in which case don't...

Up Art...


With "Up" moving ever closer to release it seems that artwork is leaking out...



Both officially and not. Over at Disney's Hollywood Studios you can catch a glimpse of some of the concept art that Pete Docter used when coming up with the characters and the story.





If this artwork has you salivating then may I suggest you pre-order "The Art of Up" because it's filled with these kinds of gorgeous images from cover to cover...

Hat Tip to Studio Central.

A Happy Medium For Animation?


Ok, so we got word from WonderCon that Disney plans on releasing a CG film every 18 months and a hand drawn film every two and a half years...

Now I've seen where some people are making a fuss about this. Wondering why it's going to take almost twice as long to make a 2D versus a 3D film really misses a great deal of what this says about Walt Disney Animation Studios. That winds up being at least six CG films over a decade and at least 4 hand drawn over the decade. Add those up and then divide them by a decade and what do you come up with? One new Disney animated film every year. That's pretty cool. That's the way it was planned in the 90's but many of those pictures didn't live up to the critical and box office pressure of expectations that comes with the Disney name. I don't think that's gonna happen this time around... bean counters and Suits without any creativity won't be sticking their noses in on story meetings. People that love film, love story and love animation will be the driving force in these films over the next decade.

If you've looked at the reports of the "The Princess and the Frog" panel you'll also note what was said about films coming down the pipeline for Disney Animation. Marlon West talked about the backlash/stigma against animated films with CG in them(I guess like the ballroom scene in "Beauty and the Beast"). From what he says, Lasseter is fully aware of the fans getting tired of everything being computer animated. Which is why P and F will have almost no computer animation in it. It's trying to make a statement that story is king... that story matters most of all. Not paint, not pixels. STORY.

But the film after that is making a statement as well. Disney's 2010 release, "Rapunzel" is boldly professing something that is directly opposite while being entirely in line with Princess... Not all computer animation has to look like computer animation. It's going to become far more painterly I believe and I have a little premonition that you're going to notice the difference between a Disney animated film and a Pixar animated film, in a good way. John seems determined to make sure that they don't just come off as indistinguishable parts of one company, but two uniquely individual houses of story. And it will show in the films they create. The one thing they will have in common is quality.

And as the next few years pass by you're going to notice something else... many of these films, the hand drawn ones, will become hybrid films as West calls them. Ones that use computer animation, but in subtle ways that you won't be able to notice. And then there will be the subterfuge film. This will be the film made by WDAS that everyone loves and no one can understand how it's made. Because it's going to look like a hand drawn film, but it's going to be a totally computer generated film. Parts of it can happen now. Just look at "Bolt" with some of the backgrounds. Parts of will happen next year. The style of animation that "Rapunzel" has is going blow people's minds, trust me. And then, in the coming years some of the films that your going to see are going to surprise you. Because as much as many of us want to get back to films like those in Disney's Second Golden Age, this one's gonna be different. As much as I think the stories are going to be better, I also think the animation gurus in the Hat Building are planning on stunning us with what they're going to be able to achieve. Parts of this is just my hunch and parts of it are whispers that I'm hearing... put it together and this is the inevitable conclusion I come to.

I can't wait for it all to unfold in beautiful layers of both brush and pen...

Sunday, March 1, 2009

Dastardly And Muttley In That Wacky Hollywood...


Why do we need another "Total Recall" (yes, I know the story was different and it required more of a Richard Dreyfuss type charcter but it was an okay movie for the time)? Why do we need another “Romancing the Stone”(Indy rip off, but I'll take it over KOTCS)? Why do we need another “Neverending Story” (not that any of these are "Citizen Kane", but c'mon!)? When will the story freaking end?!?! I thought remakes were for movies that DIDN’T WORK. They were for movies that had a great kernel of an idea but never quite came to fruition. In a year where we have some great cinematic achievements from “The Dark Knight" (yes it’s BATMAN, but oh what an original telling of the caped crusader it was)” to “Slumdog Millionaire”, why does Hollywood have to just regurgitate the same old stories in a new packaged form? The simple answer is that they are bankrupt of ideas.

But maybe that isn’t THAT simple. Maybe they have great ideas, but are afraid of getting behind them and rolling the dice. I get it, the economy is horrible, who wants to take a chance? But this has been going on LONG before our economic melt down, so that is just an excuse. Hollywood has been doing this forever. In the 80’s with the birth of video, you used to be able to make a poster, a one line pitch and get funding for your movie. In the 90’s you had a poster, a one line pitch and when you got the money you put a down on a house (kinda déjà vu) so GOODBYE PRE-SALES. But now, if you don’t have the poster, a one line pitch, the first 30 minutes of the film shot and a letter saying that Tom Cruise is signed (not attached), forget it. The 70’s brought us masterpieces in film, why? Because the artists were left alone to create (although having a limited budget helped them – a big shout out to George L and Steven S if you’re listenin’).

The money people (suits) left the creative to the creative and only got involved when they could throw their weight behind a project for it to be a positive effect not a negative one (and that meant staying out of the creative soup). Now, with Hollywood churning out more comic book and video game movies (yes, I know they have a fan base – automatic $$$$ - but if you could just stop the pop cultural referencing Kevin Smith), that allegiance is gone. And what we have left is people who grew up in the 80’s running studios, calling the shots and by darn it if they loved “Dastardly, Muttley and the Wacky Races” growing up, well then that would be a swell movie idea – hot damn, let’s put it in development, no….better yet, let’s start shooting the f***er!

I hope that after Danny Boyle settles down from all the oscar hype, he like many artists take a stand (I am talking to you Darren A). Now he has the cache to do so, PLEASE for the love of God, don’t “go Hollywood”, stick to your guns and create original stories like “Sunshine" (2001 rip off)”, “Trainspotting (gotta love a post modern "Clockwork Orange"” and “Slumdog” (a conventional love story, but the technique in which it was done was unique, you gotta give it that – and the music! Wow, what an oscar night, unless you are Peter Gabriel). And maybe if Danny Boyle doesn’t get his phone ringing by then, he could always do a “Trainspotting” sequel called “Porno”……no? Okay well what about a sequel to “A Life Less Ordinary” perhaps? Too on the nose? Well what about if all else fails “Sunshine II – The Return?” Oh, they all died in the end, I remember now…well maybe a live action Dastardly and Muttley wouldn’t be such a bad idea after all…no? Well maybe if it had Tom Cruise attached…