Showing posts with label adaptions. Show all posts
Showing posts with label adaptions. Show all posts

Monday, May 18, 2009

Marvel Finds Their Trickster...


Another piece of Kenneth Branagh's puzzle falls into place...

No sooner have they named(not officially) the hammer holder himself than they announce who will be his nemesis in the upcoming film. Again, I'm glad they didn't just go with a star(Disney are you listening?) and picked an unknown. I know Josh Hartnett had been talked about for the role, but he's way too buff to play this character and doesn't have the range for part if it's the same character from the script I've read. Loki is a tormented villain. He's definitely evil, but complex and not a cardboard cutout supervillain. Tom Hiddleston looks exactly right. I like the direction they're going in. Maybe they plan on using an older famous actor as Odin and that way they'll appease the Suits with a name.

But right now I'm happy the direction this is headed...

Saturday, May 16, 2009

Your God Of Thunder Has Been Chosen...


It appears Kenneth Branagh has chosen his Thor...

And it appears to be a pretty good choice. Chris Hemsworth who was last seen as the father of James T. Kirk in the new "Star Trek" series will play the long blond haired, hot tempered Marvel superhero. I was very worried that a Pro-Wrestler would get the gig. From what I hear the audition went pretty good and I trust Branagh as he's someone that knows how to stage something like this. I only hope they stick to the script I read. I really don't want to see the son of Odin turn into an ordinary doctor. I was always fond of the Walt Simonson stories which are what the Mark Protosevich script was really like.

Developing...

Friday, April 10, 2009

The Right To Film Umbrellas...


I forgot to mention this the other day...

As I said in a previous post about my "Without Tights" article, most of those comic books are now in development at various studios. Well, one of my favorite titles in that article, "The Umbrella Academy" is moving closer to being filmed right now.

Universal Studios has hired screenwriter Mark Bomback("Race to Witch Mountain," "Live Or Die Hard") to write the screenplay. I can only hope that RTWM was written while he had a hangover. Die Hard wasn't that bad except for a really badly miscast villain and "Constantine" was really a surprisingly good film. The film will be co-produced by Universal and Dark Horse Comics. This is the first project from the three year deal between the two after the studio was pleased with last year's Hellboy sequel.

Developing...

Tuesday, April 7, 2009

Disney Hires Horse Soldiers...



The Walt Disney Studios and uber-producer Jerry Bruckheimer's Jerry Bruckheimer Films have purchased the screen rights to Doug Stanton's upcoming book "Horse Soldiers." The tale is about an elite group of special forces and CIA operatives that secretly went into Afghanistan and aligned themselves with rebel fighters to topple the Taliban...

Bruckeimer(Black Hawk Down) will produce the film through Touchstone Pictures, no writers are yet attached to the project.

Developing...

Tuesday, March 24, 2009

The Mouse May Have A Stoneheart...


Walt Disney Studios and ImageMovers are currently working to pick up rights to "The Stoneheart Trilogy" for Robert Zemeckis to produce according to The Hollywood Reporter...

The novels are about a twelve year old boy in London that finds an alternate world where statues have souls and come to life. The boy finding the place upsets the balance between good and evil and has to work with an orphaned girl and statue of a WW I gunner to put the world back into balance.

More MoCap madness from Zemeckis, who now seems to live in an alternate world where he doesn't have to deal with actors as much...

Thursday, March 5, 2009

Wolverine Trailer No Mouse...


The new trailer for "X-Men Origins: Wolverine" is up
thanks to to USA Today...

But you might want to put on your reading glasses because it's really small. Here's to hoping the film is great. I think Hugh Jackman is a great actor so long as he's not teamed up with Stephen Sommers...

Sheesh, I hate all the prefaces before the title. Why can't it just be Wolverine? Does anyone not living under a rock NOT know that he was part of the X-Men. I'm gonna hate Captain America if they really do have that "The First Avenger" before it. Can you imagine if they had done Batman or Superman the same way with "The First Justice Leaguer?" Suits... sometimes you just wanna beat some sense into their brains and then you realize: "Oh wait, they don't have brains!"

I read the original draft of Wolverine, but it's clear from the trailer that it's been rewritten. I like the version I read a lot. It was very good. One of the few things I didn't like was the bone claws, which come from an issue of the comics... one that I don't agree with for sure. The claws in most of the Wolvie canon are mechanical and added when he gets his bones were coated with adamantium. It just makes a more logical argument for me, but that's me.

You can wake up now, I'm through being geeky...

Sunday, March 1, 2009

Dastardly And Muttley In That Wacky Hollywood...


Why do we need another "Total Recall" (yes, I know the story was different and it required more of a Richard Dreyfuss type charcter but it was an okay movie for the time)? Why do we need another “Romancing the Stone”(Indy rip off, but I'll take it over KOTCS)? Why do we need another “Neverending Story” (not that any of these are "Citizen Kane", but c'mon!)? When will the story freaking end?!?! I thought remakes were for movies that DIDN’T WORK. They were for movies that had a great kernel of an idea but never quite came to fruition. In a year where we have some great cinematic achievements from “The Dark Knight" (yes it’s BATMAN, but oh what an original telling of the caped crusader it was)” to “Slumdog Millionaire”, why does Hollywood have to just regurgitate the same old stories in a new packaged form? The simple answer is that they are bankrupt of ideas.

But maybe that isn’t THAT simple. Maybe they have great ideas, but are afraid of getting behind them and rolling the dice. I get it, the economy is horrible, who wants to take a chance? But this has been going on LONG before our economic melt down, so that is just an excuse. Hollywood has been doing this forever. In the 80’s with the birth of video, you used to be able to make a poster, a one line pitch and get funding for your movie. In the 90’s you had a poster, a one line pitch and when you got the money you put a down on a house (kinda déjà vu) so GOODBYE PRE-SALES. But now, if you don’t have the poster, a one line pitch, the first 30 minutes of the film shot and a letter saying that Tom Cruise is signed (not attached), forget it. The 70’s brought us masterpieces in film, why? Because the artists were left alone to create (although having a limited budget helped them – a big shout out to George L and Steven S if you’re listenin’).

The money people (suits) left the creative to the creative and only got involved when they could throw their weight behind a project for it to be a positive effect not a negative one (and that meant staying out of the creative soup). Now, with Hollywood churning out more comic book and video game movies (yes, I know they have a fan base – automatic $$$$ - but if you could just stop the pop cultural referencing Kevin Smith), that allegiance is gone. And what we have left is people who grew up in the 80’s running studios, calling the shots and by darn it if they loved “Dastardly, Muttley and the Wacky Races” growing up, well then that would be a swell movie idea – hot damn, let’s put it in development, no….better yet, let’s start shooting the f***er!

I hope that after Danny Boyle settles down from all the oscar hype, he like many artists take a stand (I am talking to you Darren A). Now he has the cache to do so, PLEASE for the love of God, don’t “go Hollywood”, stick to your guns and create original stories like “Sunshine" (2001 rip off)”, “Trainspotting (gotta love a post modern "Clockwork Orange"” and “Slumdog” (a conventional love story, but the technique in which it was done was unique, you gotta give it that – and the music! Wow, what an oscar night, unless you are Peter Gabriel). And maybe if Danny Boyle doesn’t get his phone ringing by then, he could always do a “Trainspotting” sequel called “Porno”……no? Okay well what about a sequel to “A Life Less Ordinary” perhaps? Too on the nose? Well what about if all else fails “Sunshine II – The Return?” Oh, they all died in the end, I remember now…well maybe a live action Dastardly and Muttley wouldn’t be such a bad idea after all…no? Well maybe if it had Tom Cruise attached…

Wednesday, February 25, 2009

Gore Doesn't Have A Clue About Another Pirates Film...


Gore Verbinski is one director in demand...

He's attached to four or five different projects. None of which are ready to go and unfortunately, one of them is NOT Pirates of the Caribbean 4. I hope Disney does try and make it so that he can do the sequel. I think since he was the one in charge of the first trilogy, he should be in charge of the second. Ooops, I mean film not trilogy.

Ehem...

But now comes word that Gore will direct a film version of "Clue" the classic board game(not the Disney version, btw). Not that the first film was such a huge blockbuster, but that doesn't stop a studio from trying. There are no writers attached to the project so it doesn't mean it's a go and could take as much time as the "Bioshock" project that he's been connected to for some time. Here's hoping Disney can come to an agreement between Bruckheimer and Depp and some very busy screenwriters. I'd like to see the Mouse get the Pirates filmed by Gore.

Verbinski, that is...

Thursday, February 19, 2009

Pete's Dragon Returns...


Kind of...

Many of us have wondered what some of the projects that Disney's new comic book company would be working on... Speculation has run from many theme park attractions to several lesser known films. I can tell you that one of the project it's working on....

It appears that Kingdom Comics is working on new stories featuring Elliot the lovable Dragon from "Pete's Dragon" back in those bellbottomed 70's. Not sure if or how much Pete will play into this, if at all, but the primary focus will be on Elliot.

It's not known if this will lead to a film project, but that was one of the original intentions of Kingdom; to develop properties that could be turned into games, television and film crossovers.

Developing...

Monday, February 16, 2009

No Nothings...


Arrrrghhh!

I hate doing this... Really, I do.

I don't like being negative. I think it's way too easy to go around being that way. You'll find it far more probable that someone says "no" to something. It's just the easier way to do things in life.

But...

When I saw this, I knew it was wrong. I knew it was another one of those "No" moments. And now it's going to be another one of those "No" posts. Only this one is not about McG and Nemo. But like those posts, this is about another part of my childhood that Suits just can't seem to stop molesting. So here it is...

The rumors are going around that Zach Efron(High School Musical) is going to be playing a certain iconic youth in Warner Bros. live-action "The Adventures of Johnny Quest" and I just have to say something to the Suits. Wait. No, I have to watch my language since yung'ns might be around. But do these WB Suits actually have functioning brains or did God somehow forget to install them? Sorry, I can't blame God for the behavior of Suits. But I for the life of me can't understand why we can't find more producers that "get" a project like this. Johnny Quest is a twelve or thirteen year old boy not a seventeen or eighteen year old boy. Which I might mention that Efron doesn't even look like anymore... I'd have trouble buying him as a freshman in college, much less high school. But the whole point about Johnny Quest is that he's just entering puberty. He's on the cusp of adolescence and he's not really into girls yet. He's into adventure and travelling the world with his dad and pals. If they truly are offering this part to Zach then they're going a whole other route. One that I don't care for. I also know that there's talk of having Dwayne Johnson play Race Bannon and while I don't really think he's right for the part, I can understand the casting there. But Zach Efron? Really!?

And I can tell that it's probably going to be a modern take in a modern setting. If I were doing JQ, it'd be set in the early 60's like the classic animated series. It's set in a more innocent time when these adventures were more believable. A time of optimism where the world that awaited us was scary and exciting, but also positive and fun. Setting it in contemporary society does nothing for the story. It's clear that the people in charge over at Warner really don't know how to protect their own properties. If they put as much care into Quest as they do Batman then I wouldn't be worried about this one. My fear is we've got another misfire on our hands here, just like "Superman Returns" was. But I really hate being negative. It makes you feel so old, like you've become your dad... or granddad. So I'm going to just shut up now.

Now, if you'll excuse me, I have to go tell some kids to get off my lawn...

Tuesday, February 10, 2009

Frodo Never Lived...


Jeff Pepper over at the always great 2719 Hyperion has a detailed article on the history of the perceptions that Walt Disney once owned the rights to The Lord of the Rings...

It's a great read, give it a look.

Sunday, January 25, 2009

Going Back To "Old School" Mars...


Or why I loooove Andrew Stanton...

Not in that way. Shaadup!

Andrew Stanton spoke during a writers panel held at the Santa Barbara Film Festival and as has been the case lately, John Carter came up.

Here's the cliff notes:

It will be live-action, but it's not going to be a stylized version. Almost as if you dropped in a National Geographic documentary film crew on the red planet and discovered a long, lost civilization.

The project is huge and is a great challenge for him.

It will be a Walt Disney Picture(as we mentioned before) not a Pixar film, but being as Pixar is now Disney that shouldn't even need to be mentioned.

No plans for 3D, but Disney will probably pressure him(and they will, I'm sure).

The second draft of the script is done and casting will begin soon.

And my favorite bit of news is John Carter will be a Civil War soldier, which means if you know your Edgar Rice Burroughs, then you'll understand that Stanton is keeping it a faithful adaption. I've read a few adaptions of this and everyone tried to make it a "modern" John Carter set in present day events. They just didn't get it... and Andrew Stanton does. Which is why I loooove him.

Shaadup!

Hat Tip to Ain't It Cool News.

Thursday, January 8, 2009

When I Dream...


Ok, I thought I'd step back for a second...

I don't want to seem like I'm rooting for the remake/prequel of 20K to fail, because I wouldn't want that. And as I mentioned here and the last post, it isn't a sequel or remake so much as an original tale about what led up to the book/film. So it could be good, it might be great. But I just am not a big fan of McG because he seems to be Michael Bay without the substance... and if you know where I'm coming from then you understand that statement. If you don't understand it, then may I suggest a quick course in Geek 101. I've heard he's toned the flash down for his new "Terminator Salvation" film and I'll reserve judgement on that film till I've seen it. I just don't want the visuals to overwhelm the story and if he decides to make a slick, fast cutting, edgy version of the Jules Verne classic I'll hate it. I pray he's got a great script from which to work and I hope he adheres to it.

After posting about it last night, I got to thinking. What Disney movies would I like to see? I mean, I've posted about what movies have been made that could/should have been Disney films, but...

What films haven't been made that I'd like to see? And by that, I divided them up in three categories. Remakes/Sequels/Adaptions.

So here are my "Dream Disney Films."

Remakes:

The Black Hole - remake directed by Danny Boyle and written by John Hodge, Simon Beaufoy and Alex Garland.

Davy Crockett - reinterpretation written and directed by Michael Mann starring Russell Crowe.

The Island at the Top of the World - remake written by John Logan and directed by Ridley Scott.

The Gremlins - live-action adaption of the Roald Dahl story done for Walt in the 40's.

Dungeons & Dragons - a more faithful remake than the horrible adaptions that have been done by other studios that don't know what to do with this property. And I'd get an excellent screenwriter and director for it. My choice would be Joss Whedon.

The Haunted Mansion
- an actual "good" version of this attraction. Specifically, the one based on the idea Terry Rossio wanted to do and while we're at it, get Gore Verbinski to direct it as well. The tone of his "The Ring" would be perfect...


Sequels:

20,000 Leagues Under The Sea - an actual sequel to the classic Disney film written and directed by Brad Bird.

Roger Rabbit - a sequel to the 1988 film, not necessarily the one that was supposed to star Tom Cruise, but one that continues the adventures of that crazy rabbit directed by Robert Zemeckis and written by Michael Chabon.

Mary Poppins - a sequel, not a reimagined or prequel. There's been talk going around that Disney wanted to do something with this and although I know many would be opposed to this, I have no problem "if" it's done right because it's based on a series of books, not just one story. But that said, it's a big IF...

Star Wars - it goes without saying that I'd like to see any Star Wars film with the Disney logo in front of it. Just not by Lucas... let a new breed work in his world. My choice, Peter Jackson on Dark Forces, Zach Synder on Knights of the Old Republic or David Fincher on Episode Seven, ect.


Adaptions
:

The Chronicles of Prydain
- a faithful adaption of the books "The Black Cauldron" was based upon. Perhaps the one that Guillermo del Toro had been in talks with the Mouse about doing?

The Thief of Always - an adaption of Clive Barker's "The Thief of Always" directed by Chris Weitz and Paul Weitz, they seem to work much better together than apart... This would be a great family film.

Ender's Game - an adaption of the great book by Orson Scott Card written and directed by James Cameron.

Huckleberry Finn - an adaption of Mark Twain's pentacle of storytelling directed by Steven Spielberg from a screenplay by David Mamet and David Koepp.

The Graveyard Book - a film version of Neil Gaiman's mesmerising book with a screenplay by Neil Gaiman and Roger Avary to be directed by Tim Burton.

Where the Sidewalk Ends - a live-action adaption of Shel Silverstein's classic children's story directed by Kevin Lima.

The Adventures of Calvin and Hobbes - a hand-drawn animated film version of Bill Watterson's award winning cartoon strip. I'll let Lasseter pic whoever he wants for this, but I'd have Watterson write the script and Chris Williams direct it... the funny pages in the papers have been bland ever since it ended. And I know he wouldn't let anyone adapt his work, but hey, it's my wish list.

Artemis Fowl - an adaption of Eoin Colfer's classic book series. Never read it? Think of it in the authors own words: "Die Hard with Fairies." Could be the Harry Potter franchise that Disney's been looking for, although it's more like "Sinister Johnny Quest meets magic" to me...

Hiawatha
- I've always thought an animated version of Hiawatha the Native American myth would make a great adaption. Kind of like an American Indian version of Disney's Hercules film.

And this is just what I've come up with off the top of my head... so there you go Disney. Take from it if you will. Of course, if you need any help in making them then give my agent a call...

I work for a wee bit less that McG.

Tuesday, December 9, 2008

ABC Gives Exiled Chance...



The ABC Television Network is ordering up a pilot based on the Vertigo Comic "Fables." I've actually read a couple of these issues, so I know a little bit about it. I'm not an expert, by far, but it is an intriguing story. if done properly this could turn out to be a clever piece of work to enjoy.

Of course, if the Suits tinker too much with it...

Monday, September 29, 2008

Alice, Through The Looking Glass...


Well, we now have our first pictures of Alice from Tim Burton's adaption of the classic novel/Disney film.

The guys over at INF Daily have gotten a scoop with some shots of Mia Wasikowska in the title role...

Go over and take a peek.

Tuesday, August 19, 2008

Disney Getting Devil's Due...


It appears that Disney's ABC Family Channel is getting another super-hero series(remember Middleman?)...

Will all the success that comic book films are having the Mouse appears to have optioned another little known comic book for adaption to television. Devil Due Publishing's "Will Triumph Fights Alone" is being planned by the Mouse for adaption.

What is it?

The story follows a novic superhero Will Triumph(clever huh?) who is the son of a powerful superhero team known as the "Dynamics" until they were killed fighting their arch-enemy , Dr. Loricas. He gets hold of his parents' Rings of Power. The catch is these rings only work for a married couple(Holy matrimony, Batman!). The story finds Will hunting for Dr. Loricas to avenge his parents death and also trying to find that "special girl" who will help him unlock those rings so he can be the super-hero he's always believed he would become.

Will it be any good? Tune in next year when it premieres on ABC Family and find out... same bat time, same bat- ahhh, you get where I'm going here, don't you?

Developing...